more board oversight on workforce diversity</a>. As more investors — and directors — see diversity as a business imperative, the pressure will also rise for greater racial/ethnic diversity in the boardroom. Meanwhile, regulatory pressure has factored into the increase in women on tech boards; laws such as the one in California requiring a certain number of female board members have compelled companies to add women to the board. Legislative pressure could be a factor in increasing the ethnic/racial diversity of boards in the coming years. </li> <li> <strong>Increasing public pressure.</strong> At the same time that regulators increase their scrutiny, issues like systemic racism and diversity are generating more discussion in the court of public opinion. As the topic remains top of mind among consumers and in the media, tech boards may need to do some soul searching, even if regulators remain out of the discussion. </li> <li> <strong>Non-CEOs on boards. </strong>The typical targets for board searches — CEOs and CFOs — are the positions with the least diversity in the C-suite, according to our research. Furthermore, many CEOs and CFOs are maxed out in terms of how many directorships they can take. As this forces boards to look to other C-level positions for new board directors, they may find many willing and qualified candidates for their boards. They may also find value in adding “the customer voice” to tech boards, by adding top executives from industries like retail, healthcare, industrial and other major GDP segments where there are big technology budgets and greater diversity than tech. </li> <li> <strong>Younger generations.</strong> The youngest members of the workforce today, Gen Z and millennials, are much more socially active and diverse. As they continue to replace the old guard in leadership roles, there is good reason to believe that their drive for diversity will similarly trickle upward to increasing racial/ethnic representation on boards. </li> </ul> <h5> Conclusion </h5> <p> By thinking more creatively about who can add value to a board, especially outside of an organization’s direct area of domain expertise, companies are already finding valuable board members, and more can be done here. At the other end of the spectrum, hands-on, proactive work increasing diversity throughout the pipeline down to the entry level can have a long-lasting effect on board composition. Combine this with rising pressure from governments and consumers, and there’s reason to think that the optimism above could point to increased diversity on tech boards. In the meantime, we eagerly look forward to seeing the data in our next <em>U.S. Technology Spencer Stuart Board Index</em> in the fall of 2021 and finding out what progress may have been made in the past year.</p>">